Regular readers of our blog have probably noticed the addition of videos to some of our articles. We are excited to have these educational and promotional videos available for the public. We invite you to visit our You Tube Channel, browse the videos and let us know what you think. If you know someone who might benefit from watching one of our videos be sure to let them know about this great resource.
In the survey of 975
parents and 152 adult children, 64% of mothers said it was “not at all
difficult” to start a conversation with an adult child about their finances;
only 54% of fathers felt the same way. In addition, 79% of women, versus 69% of
men, reported having had “comprehensive discussions” with their adult children
about estate planning or wills. The same was true of 66% of women vs. 56%
of men about health and elder-care topics and 70% of women vs. 55% of men about
running out of money in retirement.
Although there are many reasons
why moms might be the best to approach, most of them are mere conjecture. More
important, however, is the reality that senior parents really do not enjoy
talking about their finances. That is understandable.
All that noted, “the talk” needs
to be had, sooner rather than later. At Idaho Estate
Planning, we can help. We know how to help your family get things moving forward. Call us now to schedule a consultation. Remember, good
planning is no accident.
If you find yourself taking on
the responsibility of a caretaker to your elderly parents, are you documenting
your efforts? If you are giving time and money for the care of loved ones and
would like to take tax deductions for your efforts, you ought to make sure you
brush up on your bookkeeping skills. Otherwise, when it comes to tax time, you
may be out of luck (and money).
Forbes examined the Olivo case in an article titled “Mother's Day? Son Claims $1.2M Tax Write-Off
For Helping Mom.” From the title of the article, it is clear that the son
may have been a bit generous in his claim. To make matters even more
interesting, the son was a tax attorney.
Background: Anthony Olivo was
the son/tax attorney. He took nearly ten years away from his law practice to
care for his parents. Accordingly, Anthony lost his law practice income.
However, he did collect fees from his parents for managing their estates. When
Anthony’s mother died, he sought to deduct $44,200 in administrator’s fees, $55,000
in accountant’s and attorney’s fees, and a whopping $1,240,000 for a
near-decade’s worth of lost wages (he did manage his own firm, after all).
The IRS raised an eyebrow, and
then raised it further when they took a look at his documentation of all of
these fees and amounts. Problem: there was no contract, no invoice, and no
evidence. Not good.
Even when Anthony was handling
the estate and filing the tax return he didn’t keep track of his time and just
estimated. Also, not good.
In reality, not everything
claimed may have been deductible. Nevertheless, the lack of recordkeeping
killed any chance for success.
If you and your loved ones are
entering a period of caregiving, then a little forethought and planning can go
a long way. In the end, a little recordkeeping can be the deciding factor in
making your claim.
For more information on this and other Elder Law issues, contact Idaho
Estate Planning and schedule a consultation. If you are caring for a veteran you need to investigate the VA Pension Benefit as well. Remember,
good planning is no accident.
U.S. health care has been in
flux since 2010, with many aspects of health care reform still on hold. Hospice
is one area that is still waiting for help with protecting the elderly and
those in end-of-life care.
As reported quite recently
through the Kaiser Health News,
hospice care has yet to be expanded under the Medicare project set out three
years ago.
The article titled “Medicare Lags In Project to Expand Hospice”
examines the very real conflict between “curative” treatment and “palliative”
treatment. The former is meant to cure a condition and thereby prolong life,
and the latter is meant to ease the pain caused by a condition without a focus
on effecting a cure.
Naturally, the curative and
palliative treatments are often considered opposites. In fact, choosing
palliative care would mean giving up all hope on curative care. Consequently,
it is only natural that rapidly declining patients delay their entry into
palliative hospice care.
The 2010 law was to begin
inroads into exploring combined care, the possibility of both curative and
palliative concurrently. Logically, this should ease transitions without
forsaking hopes, likely reducing costs in the process. To date, however, this
has not happened.
Health care planning is complicated, and since so much
is at stake be sure to consult a professional when exploring your options.
The different ways you inherit
assets are just as varied as the assets themselves. Such is the case with an
inherited IRA. When is it “yours” and how do you avoid tax issues?
The Slott Report recently addressed the consequences of when a
surviving spouse inherits the IRA of their deceased spouse and both have
reached age 70 ½, the age for Required Minimum Distributions (RMDs). The
article titled “Inherited IRA: When do You Own It?”
noted that one must be very careful.
For starters, the inheriting
spouse must be the “designated” beneficiary. Assuming that is the case, what
happens when your spouse dies in December and has not withdrawn the required
RMD? Must you as the surviving spouse calculate your RMD on both account
balances, your spouse’s and your own?
RMDs are always tricky because
the penalties are steep, with a 50% penalty tax on the amount required but not
taken.
We first published this blog in June of 2011. We hope you enjoy it as it is still timely.
As we and our loved ones age, we
put a lot of effort (and resources) into making sure a hospital bed is
available when needed. New research shows that while that hospital bed may
sometimes be necessary, getting up and out of it as quickly as possible is key
to recovery. As it turns out, the hospital bed is a huge contributor to old-age
infirmity, as studies prove that bed-rest and immobility slow healing and stunt
recuperation.
A recent New York Times column, “The New Old Age” covered the results of a study
conducted by University of Texas physician, Dr. Steve Fisher. Using a step
activity monitor (a fancy pedometer), the Texas team found that just an extra
600 steps a day, or about 12 total minutes of slow walking, could significantly
shorten hospital stays. Although Dr. Fisher calls for further study, he still
offered his optimism, “It’s encouraging to think that small changes can be of
broad benefit.”
Though physicians may have
advised nursing staff to help the patient ambulate, nurses and aides frequently
have little time for these tasks and the patient may not get up and walk
enough. Dr. Fisher recommends that family members take the initiative and ask
about getting a physical therapist involved early on and about whether the
family is permitted to help the patient walk.
One obstacle to an aggressive
mobility plan is the risk of falls. Not only are they a valid concern for you
and your loved one, but also for the hospital. Since 2008, a fall is grounds for Medicare to refuse to
reimburse a hospital for a patient’s care. So, it’s understandable that the hospital might be
overly cautious about families helping elderly patients walk. Nonetheless, Dr.
Fisher still encourages families to look for safe ways to help elderly patients
get up and walk. While falls can indeed be dangerous, the consequences of
prolonged immobility may be worse.
This "best of" blog comes from June of 2011. Enjoy!
If
you are a Baby Boomer nearing retirement, you probably have a different concept
of retirement than your parents. Retirement
for you may not mean an extended vacation on some sunny shore, but rather a new
phase of your working career. A phase that may, perhaps, bring more than just
another paycheck, but a new sense of meaning to your life. Morningstar recently
referred to this career transformation as the “encore career.”
Of
course, it’s not just the search for meaning that motivates Baby Boomers to
pursue an encore career. As
Morningstar points out, tough new
economic realities have transformed career reinvention from a virtue into a
necessity for millions of older Americans who aren’t ready to retire or simply
can’t afford to quit working.
Interestingly,
though the job market looks fairly bleak today, some economists predict labor
shortages in key social sector jobs. Barry Bluestone, an economist at
Northeastern University in Boston, predicts that within the next eight years,
there could be at least five million job vacancies in the U.S., nearly half of
them in social sector jobs in education, health care, government and non-profit
organization. Bluestone also predicts that Baby Boomers are going to be filling
those jobs, "We're going to see a remarkable reshaping of our labor force.
The rate of labor force participation by the 55-plus population is going to be
much higher, and older workers will represent a much higher percentage of the
overall workforce."
The Morningstar article
includes a table ranking Projected Encore
Career Growth 2008-2018. You might want to check it out. I note that
job growth is predicted to be particularly strong for teachers, nurses and
other health care providers … and not so much for lawyers.
Business owners often focus on
the tax consequences of business structure. But asset protection is a growing
concern in these litigious times, leading to the rising popularity of “limited”
forms of business such as the Limited Liability Company (LLC).
LLCs have a unique asset
protection feature against charging
orders. Maybe you have heard of these? A recent Forbes article titled “The Misunderstood Charging Order,” offers a basic explanation:
The charging order
itself is not the lien; rather, the lien is what is placed by the charging
order. Think of the charging order as a can of spray paint, and the paint is
the lien. The charging order basically sprays the lien on the debtor/member’s
interest. Stated differently, the charging order is the vehicle by which the
lien is placed on the debtor/member’s interest — it is not the lien itself.
While this is a complex subject,
basically a charging order is a
creditor’s first and last tool to extract your interests and capital from your
business (assuming they don’t try to pierce the veil). In a corporation, a
charging order can allow a creditor to actually gain a debtor’s stock interests
in the business. This can be disastrous. “Limited” company structures are
specifically designed with charging order
protection, something that could be important to you as a business
owner.
The original article goes into
greater detail, but essentially the charging
order protection means that while a creditor can place a lien on your LLC
membership interests and claim any distributions, a creditor cannot claim the membership interest itself and sabotage
the business.
While a “limited” company structure does provide a
level of asset protection, keep in mind it is not a panacea. Do not just
presume that a creditor will see an LLC and run away or settle for pennies on
the dollar (as LLCs are often marketed), as that is rarely the case.
According to the U.S. Census
Bureau, the divorce rate of first marriage is around 50 percent; second
marriages are at 60 to 67 percent and third marriages are at 73 to 74 percent.
The fact is married couples frequently disagree … even when it comes to estate
planning.
Marriage counselors stay in
business because of marital disharmony. Commonly, they represent both spouses
and seek to find common ground in a team approach. When it comes to estate
planning, however, attorneys face a potential ethical dilemma. For example,
estate planning attorneys cannot favor one spouse over the other, nor can they
keep the secrets of one spouse from the other spouse in the course of “dual
representation.”
While there’s no sense starting
trouble where there is none, nor in approaching anything in an overly legal or litigious way, sometimes
spouses really do have different estate planning interests. It’s an ethical
problem for the spouses and their estate planning attorney alike, as pointed
out in a recent Forbes article titled
“Ethics in Estate Planning for a Married Couple.” This
certainly is an issue for attorneys (and their malpractice carriers) to fret
about, but also for their clients to understand and appreciate.
Indeed, at certain junctures it
might be necessary for spouses to even engage separate counsel to wrangle their
way through an estate planning impasse. This happens many times with prenuptial
and postnuptial agreements, but in other instances as well.
Do you not need separate
counsel? Great! Still, take a moment to read the Forbes article about potential hazards. Above all, if you choose “dual
representation,” make sure you both truly are represented – and included in all
attorney-client communications.
Why wouldn’t you file a gift tax
return if you made a taxable gift? Well, for a lot of people, the answer might
be “I didn’t know it was required.” But, in this case, Redstone argues the
transfer wasn’t gift, but rather the result of an “intra-family lawsuit” and
thus “an ordinary business transaction.”
So, how long does (or can) the
IRS scour your financial history to find taxable gifts? Well, it seems they do
(or can) go back some 41 years. Whether you are a billionaire or a regular
“Joe,” this case is worth watching.
You can get the high points of
the case from a recent Bloomberg
article titled “Billionaire Redstone Challenges IRS on Tax
for 1972 Gift.” Normally the IRS is bound by a statute of limitations set
to about three years. However, an exception to this rule includes the failure to file a tax return like the
allegedly missing gift tax return of Mr. Redstone.
Apparently, the difficulty arose
over certain shares of National Amusements Inc., and a family lawsuit resulting
in a “transfer” of shares. The IRS is now calling that “transfer” a “gift” with
$1.1 million in taxes, penalties, and interest due and owing.
According to Richard Behrendt, a
former estate and gift tax auditor turned director of estate planning, “This is
unheard of… I can’t remember ever hearing of anybody going back 41 years to
raise an issue. It’s really unprecedented in my experience.”
Note: Mr. Redstone may have
become a target, given the fact he is the chairman of both Viacom and CBS, not
to mention National Amusements and all the related subsidiaries of the three.
Reportedly, Mr. Redstone is worth approximately $4.9 billion. Nevertheless,
this 41-year-look-back is a troublesome precedent.
The take-away (even if you have
a smaller fortune) is that timely filing of an accurate gift tax return will
start the clock running on a three-year statute of limitations. If no gift tax
return is filed, the statute does not apply. Thus, if a taxpayer fails to file
a gift tax return, the IRS can pursue you indefinitely.